The Stranger
While reading Albert Camus' The Stranger , I began to think about the interpretation of the court vs. Meursault, how the court was biased not necessarily towards Meursault for killing the Arab man, but how they were biased to not focus on the actual crime, but why Meursault is the way he is. It seems a bit strange to be in a court, on a jury, be prosecuting someone, and barely mention the crime whatsoever. I just thought it seemed a bit off. The fact the prosecution focused on who Meursault is in his own head is fascinating, as a man was murdered on the beach, in a cold-blooded manner if I do say, yet the prosecution seems to not care at all. While yes, he is sentenced to death, during the trial it just seems like the main focus is on Meursault's brain, not his actions. Some of this though, I feel is not real. A real court in a real country would still focus on the crime taking place, and while I understand at this time and in this location the crime may have b...